Origin paper
A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning
Mathematical Reasoning in Teachers' Presentations.
The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use
Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics
Learning mathematics by Creative or Imitaive Reasoning
Students' mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises
A framework for analysing qualities of mathematical reasoning : version 3
Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises
Mathematics and Mathematics Education Two Sides of the Same Coin Some Results on Positive Currents Related to Polynomial Convexity and Creative Reasoning in University Exams in Mathematics
Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning
The requirements of mathematical reasoning in upper secondary level assessments
Upper secondary students' task reasoning
Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning
Mathematical Reasoning Requirements in Swedish Upper Secondary Level Assessments
University Mathematics Teachers' Views on the Required Reasoning in Calculus Exams
University Mathematics Students’ Learning Difficulties
The Role of Exercises in Calculus Textbooks
Assessing mathematical creativity : comparing national and teacher-made tests, explaining differences and examining impact
The relation between test task requirements and the reasoning used by students : an analysis of an authentic national test situation
Creative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle
Mathematical Reasoning in School Tasks
Simulating Creative Reasoning in Mathematics Teaching
Why emphasise imitative reasoning? Teacher-made tests
Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking
Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving
Non-mathematics Students’ Reasoning in Calculus Tasks
What Characterises High Achieving Students’ Mathematical Reasoning?
Mathematical reasoning and familiar procedures
Att lära sig resonera : Om elevers möjligheter att lära sig matematiska resonemang
Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum
The national course tests’ impact on teachers’ written classroom assessment
TME Volume 9, Number 3
ICEMST 2014 : International Conference on Education in Mathematics , Science & Technology NON-MATHEMATICS STUDENTS ’ REASONING IN NON-ROUTINE CALCULUS TASKS
The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks
Learning mathematics without a suggested solution method: Durable effects on performance and brain activity
Creative and algorithmic reasoning – the role of strategy choices in practice and test
Mathematical competence-what is it and what ought it be ?
Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries
A Characterization of Calculus I Final Exams in U.S. Colleges and Universities
Elevers möjligheter till lärande av matematiska resonemang
Themes and Interplay of Beliefs in Mathematical Reasoning
How to read the graph

Each node is an academic paper related to the origin paper.

  • Papers are arranged according to their similarity (this is not a citation tree)
  • Node size is the number of citations
  • Node color is the publishing year
  • Similar papers have strong connecting lines and cluster together
Learn more
Center
20002022
A research framework for creative and imitative reasoningStudents' mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercisesDeveloping mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculumMathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercisesLearning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoningThe relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students usePrinciples for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoningTypes of reasoning required in university exams in mathematicsMathematical Reasoning in School TasksA Characterization of Calculus I Final Exams in U.S. Colleges and UniversitiesMathematical Reasoning in Teachers' Presentations.Upper secondary students' task reasoningThemes and Interplay of Beliefs in Mathematical ReasoningMathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countriesStudents’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solvingMathematical Reasoning Requirements in Swedish Upper Secondary Level AssessmentsAssessing mathematical creativity : comparing national and teacher-made tests, explaining differences and examining impactInvestigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye trackingMathematical reasoning and familiar proceduresUniversity Mathematics Students’ Learning DifficultiesThe effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasksCreative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggleLearning mathematics without a suggested solution method: Durable effects on performance and brain activityThe requirements of mathematical reasoning in upper secondary level assessmentsLearning mathematics by Creative or Imitaive ReasoningUniversity Mathematics Teachers' Views on the Required Reasoning in Calculus ExamsWhat Characterises High Achieving Students’ Mathematical Reasoning?A framework for analysing qualities of mathematical reasoning : version 3The relation between test task requirements and the reasoning used by students : an analysis of an authentic national test situationElevers möjligheter till lärande av matematiska resonemangSimulating Creative Reasoning in Mathematics TeachingMathematics and Mathematics Education Two Sides of the Same Coin Some Results on Positive Currents Related to Polynomial Convexity and Creative Reasoning in University Exams in MathematicsAtt lära sig resonera : Om elevers möjligheter att lära sig matematiska resonemangThe national course tests’ impact on teachers’ written classroom assessmentWhy emphasise imitative reasoning? Teacher-made testsThe Role of Exercises in Calculus TextbooksCreative and algorithmic reasoning – the role of strategy choices in practice and testICEMST 2014 : International Conference on Education in Mathematics , Science & Technology NON-MATHEMATICS STUDENTS ’ REASONING IN NON-ROUTINE CALCULUS TASKSNon-mathematics Students’ Reasoning in Calculus TasksMathematical competence-what is it and what ought it be ?TME Volume 9, Number 3Lithner, 2008Lithner, 2003Boesen, 2014Lithner, 2004Jonsson, 2014Boesen, 2010Lithner, 2017Bergqvist, 2007Lithner, 2000Tallman, 2016Bergqvist, 2012Bergqvist, 2008Sumpter, 2013Jäder, 2020Sidenvall, 2015Palm, 2011Boesen, 2006Norqvist, 2019Lithner, 2000Lithner, 2011Norqvist, 2018Jonsson, 2016Wirebring, 2015Palm, 2006Lithner, 2013Bergqvist, 2012Øystein, 2011Lithner, 2005Boesen, 2006Jäder, 2015Bergqvist, 2005Bergqvist, 2006Sidenvall, 2015Boesen, 2006Boesen, 2006Lithner, 2003Bergqvist, 2022Jukić, 2017Matic, 2014HaavoldSkovsmose, 2012Lithner, 2008Lithner, 2003Boesen, 2014Lithner, 2004Jonsson, 2014Boesen, 2010Lithner, 2017Bergqvist, 2007Lithner, 2000Tallman, 2016Bergqvist, 2012Bergqvist, 2008Sumpter, 2013Jäder, 2020Sidenvall, 2015Palm, 2011Boesen, 2006Norqvist, 2019Lithner, 2000Lithner, 2011Norqvist, 2018Jonsson, 2016Wirebring, 2015Palm, 2006Lithner, 2013Bergqvist, 2012Øystein, 2011Lithner, 2005Boesen, 2006Jäder, 2015Bergqvist, 2005Bergqvist, 2006Sidenvall, 2015Boesen, 2006Boesen, 2006Lithner, 2003Bergqvist, 2022Jukić, 2017Matic, 2014HaavoldSkovsmose, 2012
Log in to saveSave