A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning
We're experiencing high traffic, building new graphs may be slower.
Origin paper
A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning
Johan Lithner
2008
Mathematical Reasoning in Teachers' Presentations.
T. Bergqvist, Johan Lithner
2012
The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use
J. Boesen, Johan Lithner, Torulf Palm
2010
Types of reasoning required in university exams in mathematics
Ewa Bergqvist
2007
Learning mathematics by Creative or Imitaive Reasoning
Johan Lithner
2013
Students' mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises
Johan Lithner
2003
A framework for analysing qualities of mathematical reasoning : version 3
Johan Lithner
2005
Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises
Johan Lithner
2004
Mathematics and Mathematics Education Two Sides of the Same Coin Some Results on Positive Currents Related to Polynomial Convexity and Creative Reasoning in University Exams in Mathematics
Ewa Bergqvist
2006
Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning
B. Jonsson, Mathias Norqvist, Yvonne Liljekvist, Johan Lithner
2014
The requirements of mathematical reasoning in upper secondary level assessments
Torulf Palm, J. Boesen, Johan Lithner
2006
Upper secondary students' task reasoning
T. Bergqvist, Johan Lithner, L. Sumpter
2008
Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning
Johan Lithner
2017
Mathematical Reasoning Requirements in Swedish Upper Secondary Level Assessments
Torulf Palm, J. Boesen, Johan Lithner
2011
University Mathematics Teachers' Views on the Required Reasoning in Calculus Exams
Ewa Bergqvist
2012
University Mathematics Students’ Learning Difficulties
Johan Lithner
2011
The Role of Exercises in Calculus Textbooks
Johan Lithner
2003
Assessing mathematical creativity : comparing national and teacher-made tests, explaining differences and examining impact
J. Boesen
2006
The relation between test task requirements and the reasoning used by students : an analysis of an authentic national test situation
J. Boesen, Johan Lithner
2006
Creative and algorithmic mathematical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle
B. Jonsson, Yagmur C. Kulaksiz, Johan Lithner
2016
Mathematical Reasoning in School Tasks
Johan Lithner
2000
Simulating Creative Reasoning in Mathematics Teaching
Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking
Mathias Norqvist, B. Jonsson, Johan Lithner, Tony Qwillbard, Linus Holm
2019
Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving
Johan Sidenvall, Johan Lithner, Jonas Jäder
2015
Non-mathematics Students’ Reasoning in Calculus Tasks
L. Matic
2014
What Characterises High Achieving Students’ Mathematical Reasoning?
Haavold Per Øystein
2011
Mathematical reasoning and familiar procedures
Johan Lithner
2000
Att lära sig resonera : Om elevers möjligheter att lära sig matematiska resonemang
Jan Sidenvall
2015
Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum
J. Boesen, O. Helenius, Ewa Bergqvist, T. Bergqvist, Johan Lithner, Torulf Palm, B. Palmberg
2014
The national course tests’ impact on teachers’ written classroom assessment
J. Boesen
2006
TME Volume 9, Number 3
O. Skovsmose
2012
ICEMST 2014 : International Conference on Education in Mathematics , Science & Technology NON-MATHEMATICS STUDENTS ’ REASONING IN NON-ROUTINE CALCULUS TASKS
Ljerka Jukić
2017
The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks
Mathias Norqvist
2018
Learning mathematics without a suggested solution method: Durable effects on performance and brain activity
Linnea Karlsson Wirebring, Johan Lithner, B. Jonsson, Yvonne Liljekvist, Mathias Norqvist, L. Nyberg
2015
Creative and algorithmic reasoning – the role of strategy choices in practice and test
Tomas Bergqvist, Mathias Norqvist
2022
Mathematical competence-what is it and what ought it be ?
P. Haavold
Mathematical problem solving in textbooks from twelve countries
Jonas Jäder, Johan Lithner, Johan Sidenvall
2020
A Characterization of Calculus I Final Exams in U.S. Colleges and Universities
M. Tallman, M. Carlson, D. Bressoud, Michael Pearson
2016
Elevers möjligheter till lärande av matematiska resonemang
Jonas Jäder
2015
Themes and Interplay of Beliefs in Mathematical Reasoning
L. Sumpter
2013
How to read the graph
Each node is an academic paper related to the origin paper.
Papers are arranged according to their similarity (this is not a citation tree)
Node size is the number of citations
Node color is the publishing year
Similar papers have strong connecting lines and cluster together